Re: SAN performance mystery
От | Tim Allen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SAN performance mystery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44964037.6060605@proximity.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SAN performance mystery (Jeff Trout <threshar@torgo.978.org>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeff Trout wrote: > On Jun 16, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Tim Allen wrote: >> One curious thing is that some postgres backends seem to spend an >> inordinate amount of time in uninterruptible iowait state. I found a >> posting to this list from December 2004 from someone who reported >> that very same thing. For example, bringing down postgres on the >> customer box requires kill -9, because there are invariably one or >> two processes so deeply uninterruptible as to not respond to a >> politer signal. That indicates something not quite right, doesn't it? > > Sounds like there could be a driver/array/kernel bug there that is > kicking the performance down the tube. > If it was PG's fault it wouldn't be stuck uninterruptable. That's what I thought. I've advised the customer to upgrade their kernel drivers, and to preferably upgrade their kernel as well. We'll see if they accept the advice :-|. Tim -- ----------------------------------------------- Tim Allen tim@proximity.com.au Proximity Pty Ltd http://www.proximity.com.au/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: