Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups
От | Erik Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 91B42343-5543-4B8B-9BDE-7C0CF10CC236@myemma.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jun 29, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Erik Jones wrote: >> On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >>> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:00 -0500, Erik Jones wrote: >>>> On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >>>>>> If I'm correct, then for large databases wherein it can >>>>>> take hours to take a base backup, is there anything to be >>>>>> gained by >>>>>> using incrementally updated backups? >>>>> >>>>> If you are certain there are parts of the database not touched >>>>> at all >>>>> between backups. The only real way to be sure is to take file >>>>> level >>>>> checksums, or you can trust file dates. Many backup solutions >>>>> can do >>>>> this for you. >>>> >>>> Wait, um, what? I'm still not clear on why you would want to run a >>>> backup of an already caught up standby server. >>> >>> Sorry, misread your question. >>> >>> While you are running a warm standby config, you will still want >>> to take >>> regular backups for recoverability and DR. These are additional >>> backups, >>> i.e they are not required to maintain the warm standby. >>> >>> You can backup the Primary, or you can backup the Standby, so most >>> people will choose to backup the Standby to reduce the overhead >>> on the >>> Primary. >> >> Ok, yeah, that's what I was thinking and is where we are headed in >> the next month or so here at work: we already have a standby >> running and will be adding a second standby server that we will be >> using for snapshot backups (packaged with the pertinent wal >> files...) as well as periodically bringing the second standby up >> to run dumps from just to cover all of our bases and also to be >> able to take our main primary server down for maintenance and >> still have both a production and standby running. I guess I was >> really just wanting to make sure I wasn't missing some other big >> usage for incremental backups from the standby. > > Note that (currently) once you bring a standby up you can't go back > to standby mode without restoring the filesystem level backup you > started with and replaying everything. Right, got that. Erik Jones Software Developer | Emma® erik@myemma.com 800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888 615.292.0777 (fax) Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style. Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: