Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4703D221-D0C8-40C8-85FA-9BD02D6888C8@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Erik Jones wrote: > On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:00 -0500, Erik Jones wrote: >>> On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >>>>> If I'm correct, then for large databases wherein it can >>>>> take hours to take a base backup, is there anything to be >>>>> gained by >>>>> using incrementally updated backups? >>>> >>>> If you are certain there are parts of the database not touched >>>> at all >>>> between backups. The only real way to be sure is to take file level >>>> checksums, or you can trust file dates. Many backup solutions >>>> can do >>>> this for you. >>> >>> Wait, um, what? I'm still not clear on why you would want to run a >>> backup of an already caught up standby server. >> >> Sorry, misread your question. >> >> While you are running a warm standby config, you will still want >> to take >> regular backups for recoverability and DR. These are additional >> backups, >> i.e they are not required to maintain the warm standby. >> >> You can backup the Primary, or you can backup the Standby, so most >> people will choose to backup the Standby to reduce the overhead on >> the >> Primary. > > Ok, yeah, that's what I was thinking and is where we are headed in > the next month or so here at work: we already have a standby > running and will be adding a second standby server that we will be > using for snapshot backups (packaged with the pertinent wal > files...) as well as periodically bringing the second standby up to > run dumps from just to cover all of our bases and also to be able > to take our main primary server down for maintenance and still have > both a production and standby running. I guess I was really just > wanting to make sure I wasn't missing some other big usage for > incremental backups from the standby. Note that (currently) once you bring a standby up you can't go back to standby mode without restoring the filesystem level backup you started with and replaying everything. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: