Re: Removing xloginsert_slots?
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Removing xloginsert_slots? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 90958b60-9439-40d9-a4bb-934645ef6082@email.android.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Removing xloginsert_slots? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Removing xloginsert_slots?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 29. Januar 2014 20:51:38 MEZ, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> >wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2014-01-29 21:59:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> The undocumented GUC called xloginsert_slots has been introduced by >>> commit 9a20a9b. It is mentioned by the commit that this parameter >>> should be removed before the release. Wouldn't it be a good time to >>> remove this parameter soon? I imagine that removing it before the >beta >>> would make sense so now is perhaps too early... Either way, attached >>> is a patch doing so... >> >> I'd rather wait till somebody actually has done some benchmarks. I >don't >> think we're more clueful about it now than back when the patch went >> in. And such benchmarking is more likely during beta, so... > >Well, it's either got to go away, or get documented, IMHO. Yes, all I am saying is that I'd like to wait till things have calmed down a bit, so it actually makes sense to run biggerbenchmarks. I don't think removing the option is that urgent. Andres -- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: