Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8f819ff5-0162-f382-72d1-da565ceb4125@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/22/2017 02:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2017-02-22 08:43:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> (To be concrete, I'm suggesting dropping --disable-integer-datetimes >>> in HEAD, and just agreeing that in the back branches, use of replication >>> protocol with float-timestamp servers is not supported and we're not >>> going to bother looking for related bugs there. Given the lack of field >>> complaints, I do not believe anyone cares.) > > What I *am* willing to spend time on is removing float-timestamp code > in HEAD. I've not yet heard anybody speak against doing that (or at > least, nothing I interpreted as a vote against it). If I've not heard > any complaints by tomorrow, I'll get started on that. Rip it out! Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: