Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster

On 2017-02-27 17:00:23 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 02/22/2017 02:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > > On 2017-02-22 08:43:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > (To be concrete, I'm suggesting dropping --disable-integer-datetimes
> > > > in HEAD, and just agreeing that in the back branches, use of replication
> > > > protocol with float-timestamp servers is not supported and we're not
> > > > going to bother looking for related bugs there.  Given the lack of field
> > > > complaints, I do not believe anyone cares.)
> > 
> > What I *am* willing to spend time on is removing float-timestamp code
> > in HEAD.  I've not yet heard anybody speak against doing that (or at
> > least, nothing I interpreted as a vote against it).  If I've not heard
> > any complaints by tomorrow, I'll get started on that.
> 
> Rip it out!

Already happened:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b6aa17e0ae367afdcea07118e016111af4fa6bc3