Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
От | Dmitry Mityugov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8e511a144293ae656daaeeccfe2f7893@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote 2025-09-16 16:45: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:51 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:05 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> Oh! Yeah, that is surely broken now. > >> This patch seems to work OK here. The deform code is a little tricky >> as you have to think carefully about which places need TypeDatum and >> which need TypeSizeT in llvmjit_deform.c, since the v_offp variable >> really is size_t. Tested on Debian 13 with i386 packages installed. > > Thanks for doing that. It looks generally plausible to my eye, > but I'm hardly qualified to do a detailed review. > >> More changes would be needed if Datum is changed into a struct. > > I can only imagine us doing that as a compile option to help > catch errors. Our ambition need not reach to making the compile > option play with --with-llvm, perhaps. I tried the patch and it works well, thanks a lot to everyone involved in fixing this.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: