Re: BUG #17552: pg_stat_statements tracks internal FK check queries when COPY used to load data
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17552: pg_stat_statements tracks internal FK check queries when COPY used to load data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8dd1ef3e-378c-83dc-229b-e3d3e251ac11@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17552: pg_stat_statements tracks internal FK check queries when COPY used to load data (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17552: pg_stat_statements tracks internal FK check queries when COPY used to load data
Re: BUG #17552: pg_stat_statements tracks internal FK check queries when COPY used to load data |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 3/22/23 13:21, Sergei Kornilov wrote: > Hello > > I have a similar problem with exactly the same reason. Queries are counted as top level, although they are not called atthe top level. Another small example: > > set pg_stat_statements.track_utility to off; > set pg_stat_statements.track to 'top'; > do $$ declare i int; begin select 1 as n into i; end $$ language plpgsql; > select toplevel, query from pg_stat_statements order by query; > toplevel | query > ----------+----------------------------------- > t | select $1 as n > t | select pg_stat_statements_reset() > (2 rows) > > But "select $1 as n" was not a top-level query. > > In the first patch, a testcase showing the behavior now. The second patch adds a nesting level increment if track_utilityis disabled. I need to duplicate the PGSS_HANDLED_UTILITY check here because it's documented above: > >> If it's an EXECUTE statement, we don't track it and don't increment the nesting level. > I took a look, and the patch seems correct to me. It'll need better comments explaining the change, but I'll take care of that. Barring objections, I'll get this committed and backpatched. FWIW it's probably a good idea to post patches on pgsql-hackers - not everyone watches pgsql-bugs and/or CF app. Furthermore, when a patch is switched to "RFC" it's customary to mention that in the thread, along with a review. Otherwise these silent changes are quite puzzling. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: