Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit?
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87y7c5of5m.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit?
Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Gregory Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > >> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >>> I've just noticed that pg_controldata doesn't say anything about whether >>> the database is 64-bit or 32-bit. >> >> That's because there is no such concept. > > I think the relevant concept is whether Datum is 32-bit or 64-bit wide. Oh, I see what you meant now. Datum is a purely in-memory concept, it doesn't actually reach disk. We could always tighten this up a bit by listing the alignment of a handful of built-in data types but I suppose there will always be holes in this area anyways. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: