Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 475A418B.3090702@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote: > "Gregory Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > >> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> >>> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >>>> I've just noticed that pg_controldata doesn't say anything about whether >>>> the database is 64-bit or 32-bit. >>> That's because there is no such concept. >> I think the relevant concept is whether Datum is 32-bit or 64-bit wide. > > Oh, I see what you meant now. Datum is a purely in-memory concept, it doesn't > actually reach disk. > > We could always tighten this up a bit by listing the alignment of a handful of > built-in data types but I suppose there will always be holes in this area > anyways. What are we gaining here? A 32bit postmaster can't start a 64bit one... Running select version() will tell you if you are running 64 or 32bit... What am I missing? Joshua D. Drake > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: