Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87k59zop25.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle ("Mark Wong" <markwkm@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
"Mark Wong" <markwkm@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >>> Well, then the first order of business would be to write a benchmark kit. I >>> have been thinking for a while that we should make our own maintained >>> version of the DBT+* suite, or whatever other suite is appropriate. And >>> then start running it. >> >> Agreed. For a start on TPC-C, EnterpriseDB has a closer version of the kit. > > I don't recall turning away patches to make the dbt kits less TPC spec > compliant... Uhm, why would we send them to you? Are you the maintainer for DBT2 now? I looked recently and couldn't find any upstream source that had been touched any time within the last few years. Where do i find it? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: