Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87fvijh7hv.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: Tom> Another approach would be to remove AggGetPerAggEContext as suchTom> from the API altogether, and instead offer an interfacethatTom> says "register an aggregate cleanup callback", leaving it to theTom> agg/window core code to figure outwhich context to hang thatTom> on. I had thought that exposing this econtext and theTom> per-input-tuple one would provideuseful generality, but maybeTom> we should rethink that. >> Works for me. Tom> If we're going to do that, I think it needs to be in 9.4. AreTom> you going to work up a patch? Do we want a decision on the fn_extra matter first, or shall I do one patch for the econtext, and a following one for fn_extra? -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: