Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18963.1404326824@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets
Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: > "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Tom> Another approach would be to remove AggGetPerAggEContext as such > Tom> from the API altogether, and instead offer an interface that > Tom> says "register an aggregate cleanup callback", leaving it to the > Tom> agg/window core code to figure out which context to hang that > Tom> on. I had thought that exposing this econtext and the > Tom> per-input-tuple one would provide useful generality, but maybe > Tom> we should rethink that. > Works for me. If we're going to do that, I think it needs to be in 9.4. Are you going to work up a patch? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: