Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87abmyemnh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes: >> would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat >> binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). > > Depends on how big and ugly it is, I think. If you can do it just by > hacking CFLAGS and friends, sure; if it's as invasive as the Windows > build machinery, definitely not; in between, we'd have to see it. We've been through this once already. You can't do it (cleanly) with just Makefile hackery. The architectures have different endianness and possibly other ABI differences. To handle that cleanly you have to run configure once for each architecture and build each architecture with the appropriate config.h. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: