Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080121192259.L8101@thebighonker.lerctr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Gregory Stark wrote: > > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > >> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes: >>> would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat >>> binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). >> >> Depends on how big and ugly it is, I think. If you can do it just by >> hacking CFLAGS and friends, sure; if it's as invasive as the Windows >> build machinery, definitely not; in between, we'd have to see it. > > We've been through this once already. You can't do it (cleanly) with just > Makefile hackery. The architectures have different endianness and possibly > other ABI differences. To handle that cleanly you have to run configure once > for each architecture and build each architecture with the appropriate > config.h. > Could we then combine the executables into one 4-way fat binary ? I'll see what I come up with. > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: