Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 877hi7fw9j.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Branch: master Release: REL8_1 [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000 > Branch: REL8_0_STABLE Release: REL8_0_4 [a94ace079] 2005-05-24 18:02:55 +0000 > Branch: REL7_4_STABLE Release: REL7_4_9 [0a7b3a364] 2005-05-24 18:03:24 +0000 > > Previous fix for "x FULL JOIN y ON true" failed to handle the case > where there was also a WHERE-clause restriction that applied to the > join. The check on restrictlist == NIL is really unnecessary anyway, > because select_mergejoin_clauses already checked for and complained > about any unmergejoinable join clauses. So just take it out. It's easy enough to find it on the website too, or to search for some other patch as I did this morning: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=872c1497f http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=40608e7f949fb7e4025c0ddd5be01939adc79eec Having your proposed output in there would be awesome, because the use case of determining which releases contain the patch is a *huge* one of course --- and gitweb searches are easy, fast and convenient. Now I can't comment on the git_changelog tool chapter, so that's a little Off Topic, but still. Can we do something about the gitweb interface to include such a feature? Regards, -- dim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: