Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> But I still want an option for the original behavior.  I have been
> using it extensively and I like it.

You really think this:

Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000
Branch: REL9_0_STABLE [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000
Branch: REL8_4_STABLE [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000
Branch: REL8_3_STABLE [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000
Branch: REL8_2_STABLE [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000
Branch: REL8_1_STABLE [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000
Branch: REL8_0_STABLE [a94ace079] 2005-05-24 18:02:55 +0000
Branch: REL7_4_STABLE [0a7b3a364] 2005-05-24 18:03:24 +0000
   Previous fix for "x FULL JOIN y ON true" failed to handle the case   where there was also a WHERE-clause restriction
thatapplied to the   join.  The check on restrictlist == NIL is really unnecessary anyway,   because
select_mergejoin_clausesalready checked for and complained   about any unmergejoinable join clauses.  So just take it
out.

is preferable to something like

Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master Release: REL8_1 [872c1497f] 2005-05-24 18:02:31 +0000
Branch: REL8_0_STABLE Release: REL8_0_4 [a94ace079] 2005-05-24 18:02:55 +0000
Branch: REL7_4_STABLE Release: REL7_4_9 [0a7b3a364] 2005-05-24 18:03:24 +0000
   Previous fix for "x FULL JOIN y ON true" failed to handle the case   where there was also a WHERE-clause restriction
thatapplied to the   join.  The check on restrictlist == NIL is really unnecessary anyway,   because
select_mergejoin_clausesalready checked for and complained   about any unmergejoinable join clauses.  So just take it
out.

?  It's not hard to offer an option for that, I guess, but I foresee an
argument about what the default is going to be.
        regards, tom lane