Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8648.1084921159@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: > For the TODO, I would suggest something general: > - fix grant/revoke wrt SQL standard, validate errors, warnings and successes. I have a patch-in-progress that addresses these issues. I didn't get it quite finished before leaving for vacation, but hope to clean it up and commit soon. There was an open issue, which was whether we want the owner's grant options to be shown in the default ACL value or not. (This would be only cosmetic and not functional, because the code will treat the owner as having grant options in any case.) A related question is whether the information_schema display of grant options should track what the ACL says or tell the truth, namely that the owner has grant options regardless. (Doing the latter would force changing the API of aclcontains(), hence initdb.) I asked for opinions on this but got little feedback. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: