Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200405171918.i4HJIDE21711@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote: > Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: > > Well, if I issue a "REVOKE" and the rights are not revoked and could never > > have been because I have no right to issue such statement on the object, I > > tend to call this deep absence of success a "failure". > > > If I do the very opposite GRANT, I have a clear "permission denied". > > Oh, I thought you were complaining that revoking rights not previously > granted should be an error. I agree with the above; in fact it's a > duplicate of a previous complaint. Did we resolve this? Is it a TODO? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: