Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 854d3409-87d0-fa44-430d-ce2babc58f1d@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On 2019-06-01 19:10, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 2019-May-30, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> On 2018-Mar-12, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> --enable-coverage disables ccache, so that's not going to be it. > >> I think I found the answer in this commit: >> https://github.com/ccache/ccache/commit/02d3f078bd2495b8db2264ae0b2c692b4c5ba1bd >> "Add support for coverage (compiling for gcov)" >> committed for ccache 3.2.2. > >> So I think we could remove that stuff now ... > > I'd be a bit sad if we did, because where I usually do coverage checking > is my RHEL6 box, which has > > $ ccache --version > ccache version 3.1.6 > > I'll probably bite the bullet and upgrade that box sometime in the > next year or so, but it's not really a near-term project. Is there > any big hurry for having ccache for coverage builds? I happened to come across this again. I think we should make the change Álvaro was proposing. The fix in ccache is 5 years old now. For older ccache versions, you can always set CCACHE_DISABLE yourself. Doing it the other way around is hard or impossible with the current setup. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: