Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10512.1568751170@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2019-06-01 19:10, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'll probably bite the bullet and upgrade that box sometime in the >> next year or so, but it's not really a near-term project. Is there >> any big hurry for having ccache for coverage builds? > I happened to come across this again. I think we should make the change > Álvaro was proposing. The fix in ccache is 5 years old now. Fair enough, I can just install a newer ccache version locally. But should we worry about any buildfarm members running old ccache versions? It'd probably be polite to notify the owners list about what the minimum ccache version is going to be. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: