Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8530.1500996723@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Hm, I had the idea that we were already asking ExtUtils::Embed for that, >> but now I see we only inquire about LDFLAGS not CCFLAGS. Yes, this sounds >> like a promising avenue to pursue. >> >> It would be useful to see the results of >> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts >> on one of the affected installations, and compare that to the problematic >> field(s). > Why ccopts rather than ccflags? I was looking at the current code which fetches ldopts, and analogizing. Don't know the difference between ccflags and ccopts. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: