Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows

On 07/25/2017 11:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Hm, I had the idea that we were already asking ExtUtils::Embed for that,
>>> but now I see we only inquire about LDFLAGS not CCFLAGS.  Yes, this sounds
>>> like a promising avenue to pursue.
>>>
>>> It would be useful to see the results of
>>> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts
>>> on one of the affected installations, and compare that to the problematic
>>> field(s).
>> Why ccopts rather than ccflags?
> I was looking at the current code which fetches ldopts, and analogizing.
> Don't know the difference between ccflags and ccopts.
>
>             


per docs:
   ccopts()           This function combines "perl_inc()", "ccflags()" and   "ccdlflags()"           into one.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services