Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 84a8f3d6-333d-1606-ac66-259a10898e6c@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/2/16 3:54 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > In related news, RFC 7677 that describes a new SCRAM-SHA-256 > authentication mechanism, was published in November 2015. It's identical > to SCRAM-SHA-1, which is what this patch set implements, except that > SHA-1 has been replaced with SHA-256. Perhaps we should forget about > SCRAM-SHA-1 and jump straight to SCRAM-SHA-256. I think a global change from SHA-1 to SHA-256 is in the air already, so if we're going to release something brand new in 2017 or so, it should be SHA-256. I suspect this would be a relatively simple change, so I wouldn't mind seeing a SHA-1-based variant in CF1 to get things rolling. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: