Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)
От | Chad Wagner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 81961ff50702230331j7d26093ama2ef512a44b52302@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 2/23/07, Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> wrote:
Isn't that the same wikipgedia that is found at pgFoundry? The only issue I really had the the wikipgedia port is that the codebase is 1.6alpha, and it seemed like it wasn't being actively maintained anymore (infact that is what the description says), so I am not sure it has all of the bug fixes up to 1.6.10.
In any case if anyone is interested I was able to reproduce the changes that wikipgedia made and applied those changes (as well as others) all the way up to the 1.6.10 codebase. The only reason I mention this is because 1.6 is the only choice for PHP4 users. If anyone is interested I can provide the codebase, the schema still has to be created manually as was the case with wikipgedia.
I installed wikipgdia for the WPLUG wiki:
http://wplug.ece.cmu.edu/wiki/
Isn't that the same wikipgedia that is found at pgFoundry? The only issue I really had the the wikipgedia port is that the codebase is 1.6alpha, and it seemed like it wasn't being actively maintained anymore (infact that is what the description says), so I am not sure it has all of the bug fixes up to 1.6.10.
In any case if anyone is interested I was able to reproduce the changes that wikipgedia made and applied those changes (as well as others) all the way up to the 1.6.10 codebase. The only reason I mention this is because 1.6 is the only choice for PHP4 users. If anyone is interested I can provide the codebase, the schema still has to be created manually as was the case with wikipgedia.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: