Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070223001354.406db4cd.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Joshua D. Drake escribió: > > Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: > > > On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> wrote: > > >> That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon > > >> as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops > > >> scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that. > > > I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few > > > hits, too, I believe. > > > > And outages if you watch :) > > Does this mean that we believe the Wikipedia would not suffer any > outages if it ran on Postgres? > > How is the Postgres port of the Wikipedia doing this days anyway? Is it > in a shape where one would consider it "competitive"? I installed wikipgdia for the WPLUG wiki: http://wplug.ece.cmu.edu/wiki/ We haven't had a lick of trouble with it since it went up. I don't believe it's experienced any downtime in many months. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: