Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 806.1048977918@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> While at this, what do you think about adding the necessary variables >> to make now('transaction') and now('query') possible? > TODO already has: > * Add now("transaction|statement|clock") functionality I know that's what we agreed to awhile back, but I've realized that that would be a foolish way to do it. The problem is that such a function would have to be marked VOLATILE, which would prevent its use in indexscan qualifiers. The volatility labeling is a property of the function, not of the particular argument it's passed, so we'd have to label it for the worst-case behavior. Accordingly, it's a bad idea to invent now('clock') and make it the same function as the other flavors. We could get away with making now('transaction') and now('statement') ---- but the argument for this was consistency, and that argument pretty much falls flat if those two are one function while clock time is something else. So I'm back in the camp of thinking three separate parameterless functions are the way to do it. We already know what now() does, and we're not going to change it --- anyone want to propose names for the other two? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: