Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
| От | Shashank Tripathi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7cab9c1b0709021914p40f6325fg2394f0a53ac9b782@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Quite a long thread, this. My full support for the idea of taking it into an online poll and perhaps having a comment feature so people could leave their rationale. FWIW, everyone I have ever spoken to calls it Postgres. They always write PostgreSQL, with the correct spelling. I am in Asia and work with people from all over the world. As for Google, I think people misunderstand. It works through references and semantic interpolations in the background. If "postgres.org" becomes the *official* domain name and the site mentions both postgres and postgresql in its header, it'll be a cinch for Google to associate all the legacy sites talking about "postgresql" with the new shorter name. So using search engines' stash as an argument for or against the name change doesn't hold any water. Just look at the name changes in other DB or software camps. Shanx
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: