Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control.
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7c81d02d-e182-6203-312a-983f8247e93e@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/28/18 16:43, Andres Freund wrote: > a significant number of times during investigations of bugs I wondered > whether running the cluster with various settings, or various tools > could've caused the issue at hand. Therefore I'd like to propose adding > a 'tainted' field to pg_control, that contains some of the "history" of > the cluster. Individual bits inside that field that I can think of right > now are: > - pg_resetxlog was used non-passively on cluster > - ran with fsync=off > - ran with full_page_writes=off > - pg_upgrade was used I can see why you'd want that, but as a DBA, I don't necessarily want all of that recorded, especially in a quasi-permanent way. Maybe this could be stored in a separate location, like a small text/log-like file in the data directory. Then DBAs can save or keep or remove that information as they wish. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: