RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control.
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180228214311.jclah37cwh572t2c@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control.
Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, a significant number of times during investigations of bugs I wondered whether running the cluster with various settings, or various tools could've caused the issue at hand. Therefore I'd like to propose adding a 'tainted' field to pg_control, that contains some of the "history" of the cluster. Individual bits inside that field that I can think of right now are: - pg_resetxlog was used non-passively on cluster - ran with fsync=off - ran with full_page_writes=off - pg_upgrade was used What do others think? Perhaps we should rename 'tainted' to something less "blame-y" sounding, but I can't quite think of something more descriptive than 'cluster_history'. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: