Re: ext3

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:54:45 -0800, Joshua D. Drake
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> David Garamond wrote:
>
> > Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> >
> >> I recommend you don't use ext3 for any database:
> >> http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0641.html
> >>
> >> apparently its still buggy.
> >
> >
> > So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best
> > speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time.
> > I also tend to avoid reiser3, it has given us many griefs in the past.
> > XFS?
>
> We have had success with XFS and JFS. XFS seems a little better supported.

I'll 2nd (or 3rd?) that vote for XFS.  Its been rock solid for my servers.


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama@gmail.com
LlamaLand                       http://netllama.linux-sxs.org