Re: ext3
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ext3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41EC5E55.9040006@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ext3 (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ext3
|
Список | pgsql-general |
David Garamond wrote: > Tzahi Fadida wrote: > >> I recommend you don't use ext3 for any database: >> http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0641.html >> >> apparently its still buggy. > > > So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best > speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time. > I also tend to avoid reiser3, it has given us many griefs in the past. > XFS? We have had success with XFS and JFS. XFS seems a little better supported. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > > Regards, > dave > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: