Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7F3B1933-6B79-4153-AA78-26136E44057A@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On March 22, 2015 3:15:07 AM GMT+01:00, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:50:36AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > Then there's the other discussion about using the security labels >> > structure for more than just security labels, which could end up >with a >> > lot of other use-cases where the "label" is even larger. >> >> OK, the attached patch adds a TOAST table to the shared table >> pg_shseclabel for use with long labels. The new query output shows >the >> shared and non-shared seclabel tables now both have TOAST tables: >> >> test=> SELECT oid::regclass, reltoastrelid FROM pg_class WHERE >relname IN ('pg_seclabel', 'pg_shseclabel'); >> oid | reltoastrelid >> ---------------+--------------- >> pg_seclabel | 3598 >> pg_shseclabel | 4060 >> (2 rows) >> >> Previously pg_shseclabel was zero. > >Patch applied. Thanks. -- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: