Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150322021507.GG10795@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:50:36AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Then there's the other discussion about using the security labels > > structure for more than just security labels, which could end up with a > > lot of other use-cases where the "label" is even larger. > > OK, the attached patch adds a TOAST table to the shared table > pg_shseclabel for use with long labels. The new query output shows the > shared and non-shared seclabel tables now both have TOAST tables: > > test=> SELECT oid::regclass, reltoastrelid FROM pg_class WHERE relname IN ('pg_seclabel', 'pg_shseclabel'); > oid | reltoastrelid > ---------------+--------------- > pg_seclabel | 3598 > pg_shseclabel | 4060 > (2 rows) > > Previously pg_shseclabel was zero. Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: