Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7883.1333467500@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de> wrote: >> I completely agree. Assertions helped a lot dealing with concurrent >> code. How do you want to tackle this for now? Want me to create a >> separate header pg_assert.h as part of my patch? Or is it okay to >> factor it out later and include it from the general header then? > I'll just go do it, barring objections. If the necessary support code isn't going to be available *everywhere*, it should not be in postgres.h. So I did not care for your proposal to put it in dumputils. Possibly we could move assert.c into src/port/ and make it part of libpgport? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: