Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1333468540-sup-7880@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar abr 03 12:38:20 -0300 2012: > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de> wrote: > >> I completely agree. Assertions helped a lot dealing with concurrent > >> code. How do you want to tackle this for now? Want me to create a > >> separate header pg_assert.h as part of my patch? Or is it okay to > >> factor it out later and include it from the general header then? > > > I'll just go do it, barring objections. > > If the necessary support code isn't going to be available *everywhere*, > it should not be in postgres.h. So I did not care for your proposal to > put it in dumputils. > > Possibly we could move assert.c into src/port/ and make it part of > libpgport? That only leaves assert_enabled to be handled. In the backend it lives in guc.c; what to do about frontend code? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: