Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
| От | E-BLOKOS |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 74cc33d7-d113-5dee-5a5b-c62cd21b7bbd@e-blokos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? (Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp@protonmail.ch>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/26/2021 2:35 AM, Laura Smith wrote: > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Tuesday, October 26th, 2021 at 01:18, Benedict Holland <benedict.m.holland@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In my opinion, ext4 will solve any and all problems without a very deep understanding of file system architecture. Inshort, i would stick with ext4 unless you have a good reason not to. Maybe there is one. I have done this a long time andnever thought twice about which file system should support my servers. >> > > Curious, when it comes to "traditional" filesystems, why ext4 and not xfs ? AFAIK the legacy issues associated with xfsare long gone ? > > > XFS is indeed for me the most stable and performant for postgresql today. EXT4 was good too, but less performant. -- E-BLOKOS
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: