Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
| От | Laura Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5Vf342EjVYrCjs8L5uwfDEoktbrVLeRPqFtYXDll9nDDFXUyCde25uCCgqRd3z1BMGXa2vZf38LjtMAzQS2of5JSl9W5pDVJcd6-6xPxzdI=@protonmail.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? (Benedict Holland <benedict.m.holland@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 26th, 2021 at 01:18, Benedict Holland <benedict.m.holland@gmail.com> wrote: > In my opinion, ext4 will solve any and all problems without a very deep understanding of file system architecture. In short,i would stick with ext4 unless you have a good reason not to. Maybe there is one. I have done this a long time andnever thought twice about which file system should support my servers. > Curious, when it comes to "traditional" filesystems, why ext4 and not xfs ? AFAIK the legacy issues associated with xfs arelong gone ?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: