Re: branching for 9.2devel
От | David Christensen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: branching for 9.2devel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 73E07189-66D8-441F-9EB5-53C29FB9C756@endpoint.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: branching for 9.2devel (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 25, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 04/25/2011 03:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> *Ouch*. Really? It's hard to believe that anyone would consider it >>> remotely usable for more than toy-sized projects, if you have to list >>> all the typedef names on the command line. > >> Looks like BSD does the same. It's just that we hide it in pgindent: > > Oh wow, I never noticed that. That's going to be a severe problem for > the "run it anywhere" goal. The typedefs list is already close to 32K, > and is not going anywhere but up. There are already platforms on which > a shell command line that long will fail, and I think once we break past > 32K we might find it failing on even pretty popular ones. I take it the behavior of the `indent` program is sufficiently complex that it couldn't be modeled sufficiently easily bya smart enough perl script? Regards, David -- David Christensen End Point Corporation david@endpoint.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: