Re: branching for 9.2devel
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: branching for 9.2devel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20137.1303763336@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: branching for 9.2devel (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: branching for 9.2devel
Re: branching for 9.2devel |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 04/25/2011 03:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> *Ouch*. Really? It's hard to believe that anyone would consider it >> remotely usable for more than toy-sized projects, if you have to list >> all the typedef names on the command line. > Looks like BSD does the same. It's just that we hide it in pgindent: Oh wow, I never noticed that. That's going to be a severe problem for the "run it anywhere" goal. The typedefs list is already close to 32K, and is not going anywhere but up. There are already platforms on which a shell command line that long will fail, and I think once we break past 32K we might find it failing on even pretty popular ones. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: