Re: Best Procedural Language?
От | Ian Harding |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best Procedural Language? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 725602300608012014v6337f4d0r90c4c8dc3c25884a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best Procedural Language? (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Best Procedural Language?
Re: Best Procedural Language? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8/1/06, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> wrote: > Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when "Carlo Stonebanks" <cstonebanks@nissenfasteners.com> wrote: > > I am interested in finding out a "non-religious" answer to which > > procedural language has the richest and most robust implementation > > for Postgres. C is at the bottom of my list because of how much > > damage runaway code can cause. I also would like a solution which is > > platorm-independent; we develop on Windows but may deploy on Linux. > > > - Doing funky string munging using the SQL functions available in > pl/pgsql is likely to be painful; > > - Doing a lot of DB manipulation in pl/Perl or pl/Tcl or such > requires having an extra level of function manipulations that > won't be as natural as straight pl/pgsql. Another important distinguishing characteristic is whether it supports set returning functions. I think only plpgsql does right now.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: