Re: Best Procedural Language?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best Procedural Language? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44D023B3.6050809@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best Procedural Language? ("Ian Harding" <harding.ian@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Best Procedural Language?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
>> - Doing a lot of DB manipulation in pl/Perl or pl/Tcl or such >> requires having an extra level of function manipulations that >> won't be as natural as straight pl/pgsql. > > Another important distinguishing characteristic is whether it supports > set returning functions. I think only plpgsql does right now. Actually no. Plperl, plphp, plruby and I believe even pl/Tcl support set returning functions. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: