Re: pgsql: Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6e625c81-968e-42d0-802d-edfaf9cfac11@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/22/25 06:34, Amit Kapila wrote: > Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry_interval. > Branch > ------ > master > > Details > ------- > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4a0e7314f11ee03adfe9df945598c068b4179314 Hi, In this sentence : "The initial data in existing subscribed tables are snapshotted and copied in a parallel instances of a special kind of apply process." "copied in a parallel instances" seems wrong. It should be either (1) singular "in a parallel instance" or (2) plural "in parallel instances" I'm not sure which is meant. I also wonder if 'instance' is actually the correct word here at all; see the Glossary definition of 'instance': "A group of backend and auxiliary processes that communicate using a common shared memory area. One postmaster process manages the instance; one instance manages exactly one database cluster with all its databases. Many instances can run on the same server as long as their TCP ports do not conflict." Thanks, Erik > Modified Files > -------------- > doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 3 ++- > doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: