Re: win32 service code
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: win32 service code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AE3D@Herge.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | win32 service code ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> >> 3) Include in postmaster but running on a separate thread > >(not process > >> as (2)) > >> Advantages: No extra binary. No extra process. Most integration. > >> Disadvantages: Probably larger impact on postmaster code. > > > >This is the best way to go, I think. This way we can automatically > >redirect stderr to the event logger and other nice stuff like that. > > How can we do this in this case when we can't do it from another > process? > (Note - only "boot messages" are interesting anyway. Once the ereport > code is activated (and after GUC loads), we will report directly to the > eventlog. Right...that makes sense. I guess it makes little difference on this point then. I suppose even pg_ctl could handle the boot messages ('server is up', 'server is down', etc.), so it makes no difference to the postmaster whatsoever. Whatever is the easiest/safest, then. Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: