Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1'
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AD85@Herge.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Timing of 'SELECT 1' (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1'
Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1' |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I am timing small queries, and found that a PREPARE/EXECUTE of "SELECT > 1" takes about 1.2ms on my machine. A normal SELECT doesn't take much > longer, so I am wondering why a simpler query isn't faster. > > Looking at log_executor_stats, I see the following. Execute shows > nothing taking much time, mostly < .2ms, but the total seems high. I > wonder if one of our standard query start/stop functions is taking too > long and can be optimized. There seems to be a 'PostgreSQL ping' time of about 1-2 ms in best case conditions which limits the amount of queries you can fire off in 1 second, no matter how simple. In certain rare cases this is something of a bottleneck. In my personal case it would be nice to see that time lower because converted COBOL applications tend to generate a lot of 'simple' queries. Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: