Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1'
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1078951010.3554.1.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1' ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure kirjutas K, 10.03.2004 kell 17:00: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I am timing small queries, and found that a PREPARE/EXECUTE of "SELECT > > 1" takes about 1.2ms on my machine. A normal SELECT doesn't take much > > longer, so I am wondering why a simpler query isn't faster. > > > > Looking at log_executor_stats, I see the following. Execute shows > > nothing taking much time, mostly < .2ms, but the total seems high. I > > wonder if one of our standard query start/stop functions is taking too > > long and can be optimized. > > There seems to be a 'PostgreSQL ping' time of about 1-2 ms in best case > conditions which limits the amount of queries you can fire off in 1 > second, no matter how simple. Have you checked if this is a per-backend or per-connection limit? > In certain rare cases this is something > of a bottleneck. In my personal case it would be nice to see that time > lower because converted COBOL applications tend to generate a lot of > 'simple' queries. > > Merlin > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: