Why doesn't update syntax match insert syntax?
От | Rob Richardson |
---|---|
Тема | Why doesn't update syntax match insert syntax? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 67D108EDFAD3C148A593E6ED7DCB4BBDC3FB5ACC@RADCONWIN2K8PDC.radcon.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Why doesn't update syntax match insert syntax?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I've been curious about this for a long time. The syntax for an INSERT query is often much easier to use, in my opinion,then the syntax for an UPDATE query. For example, and this is what I am trying to do, assume you have a table ofinner covers containing a name field and fields named x and y to track where each cover is, and you have another tableof permissible locations for inner covers and other things, with fields containing the name of the stored item, itstype, and its x and y coordinates. I am resetting my database to initial conditions, so I am putting the inner covers in their storage locations. I've alreadyupdated the storage location table, and now I want to update the locations in the inner cover table. So I want todo this: UPDATE inner_covers (X, Y) SELECT sl.X, sl.Y FROM storage_locations sl where sl.name = inner_covers.name If I were doing an insertion, that syntax would work. But instead, I'm forced to do this: UPDATE inner_covers SET X = (SELECT sl.X FROM storage_locations sl where sl.name = inner_covers.name), Y = (SELECT sl.Y FROM storage_locations sl where sl.name = inner_covers.name) Or is there another, more convenient form of the UPDATE query that I'm not familiar with? Thanks very much! RobR
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: