Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 67093EFC-3800-48B0-9E20-82A37A5F2A7B@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 4 Jul 2023, at 20:19, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > But sadly we're kinda back where we started. fairywren is failing on REL_16_STABLE. Before the changes the failure occurredbecause the test script was unable to create the file with a path > 255. Now that we have a way to create the filethe test for pg_basebackup to reject files with names > 100 fails, I presume because the server can't actually see thefile. At this stage I'm thinking the best thing would be to skip the test altogether on windows if the path is longerthan 255. That does sound like a fairly large hammer for a nail small enough that we should be able to fix it, but I don't have any other good ideas off the cuff. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: