Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6615.909514136@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC. ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > Actually, I don't know why the Makefile.shlib needs anything > platform-specific other than perhaps helping with the naming conventions > for libraries. If the LDFLAGS_SL was in the platform template then > Makefile.shlib wouldn't need anything in that regard, right? You're right, much of that stuff could be shoved out into the Makefile.port files. Maybe all of it --- does anyone know GNU Make's substitution rules well enough to know whether shlib := lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_VERSION) can appear *before* NAME and so forth get defined? If so, the library naming rule could be defined by Makefile.port too. I was being conservative when I wrote Makefile.shlib, but I'm not sure that the order of declarations it recommends is really essential. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: