Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC.
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 363600F0.E9E9BE12@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Tom, I'm thinking of putting a "LDFLAGS_ODBC" into the port-specific > > Makefile, > I suspect that some such hackery will be necessary on almost every > platform. Maybe you should put LDFLAGS_ODBC into the template files > instead of the port makefiles? Yes, that's what I meant... > Anyway, I'd suggest making all of the LDFLAGS_SL assignments in > Makefile.shlib be += rather than :=, and then the Makefile for the > ODBC driver can add on the LDFLAGS_ODBC from wherever we decide to > get them. Are there any other hacks besides setting more flags that > we are likely to need? Actually, I don't know why the Makefile.shlib needs anything platform-specific other than perhaps helping with the naming conventions for libraries. If the LDFLAGS_SL was in the platform template then Makefile.shlib wouldn't need anything in that regard, right? > Are there any other hacks besides setting more flags that > we are likely to need? Don't know. That's why they are hacks :)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: